Most of this is known. Even apparent one would say.
I get the author is doing this as a reminder that words matter and the people behind the games are people with more desires than making a buck. But that isn’t the case everywhere. I think it might help to differentiate between a developer’s job and management/executive decisions over which they have no control (see Cyberpunk 2077). It’s hard to complain about specific people at a studio when they keep it all under an umbrella.
Also, the way a developer might not like to be called lazy, gamers probably hate being called cheap, entitled, or childish. Though, there are definitely some that do fit the bill just as there definitely exist money focused game makers who ignore or move on regardless of QA findings or similar issues.
