@raft:” A bunch of disagrees but no real comments.”
What’s the point to reply to unhinged comments that sound politically motivated and get a soft ban.
All I have to say about this is that what the FTC is asking for is normal and Microsoft shouldn’t have anything to hide if they acted in good faith.
Bellow is what the FTC is asking for.
Corporate testimony about terms that were proposed but not included in the final Ubisoft Agreement.
Corporate testimony about the alternatives to the Ubisoft Agreement that Respondents considered.
Corporate testimony from Activision on all but three noticed topics.
Any documents or corporate testimony about Respondents’ own agreement to extend their merger’s timing, which was a necessary precondition to reaching the Ubisoft Agreement.
All of those are interesting points except for the last one to a lesser extent.
