Weird comparsion. One is a story-based RPG and the other is exploration sandbox, pretty much. Just because they’re set in space? They both have exploration, yes, but No Man’s Sky is focused on that while for Starfield it’s just a nice side activity pretty much (story-dialog-loot-progression are the key there, imo).
It’s like saying that the next Fallout game will be better than Metal Gear Solid, just because you can, in theory, be stealthy in Bethesda games and they have 3rd person camera, and shooting.
Also, why does one have to «eclipse» the other at all? It’s not some sort of competiton. Oh, and let’s wait and see? Overhyping usually leads to disappointment.


