European government has, in writing, asked the European Union to find a way to host an American artificial-intelligence company. The request is unusual enough that the official making it conceded, in the same breath, that people would doubt it could be done.
The official is Alexander Pröll, Austria’s state secretary for digitalisation, and the company is Anthropic. In a letter to Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, Pröll urged member states to explore “the strategic establishment and participation of Anthropic within the European Union,” according to Bloomberg, which first reported the letter.
The trigger is recent and specific. Earlier this month the US Commerce Department ordered Anthropic to cut off foreign nationals’ access to its two most advanced systems, citing national security.
Anthropic, unable to fence off a shared cloud service by nationality, switched the models off for everyone outside the United States. A nationality-based restriction became, in practice, a global outage, and Europe found itself on the wrong side of it.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Pröll’s pitch is that Europe should not simply absorb that. “Let us jointly explore the strategic establishment and participation of Anthropic within the European Union,” he wrote, “with legal certainty, market access, capital and a set of values that suits this company.”
The framing is courtship rather than command: offer Anthropic a jurisdiction, and in return secure the continent’s access to a frontier model it cannot currently rely on.
He did not say how any of it would work. The letter does not specify whether Austria envisages a European subsidiary, a data-residency arrangement, an equity stake, or something looser, and Pröll acknowledged there would be scepticism about whether the idea was feasible at all. What he insisted on was the stakes: that Europe must not be cut off from major innovations, and that being a customer is not the same as having a guarantee.
That argument has been building in Brussels for weeks. The Commission had already held talks with Washington over restoring European access after the export order, an episode that exposed how exposed the bloc is to a US policy decision over which it has no vote.
Austria’s letter is the same anxiety, pushed one step further: rather than negotiate access, secure presence.
It also runs against the grain of the EU’s own sovereignty rhetoric, which has tended to favour homegrown champions. Much of that conversation has centred on Mistral, the French model-maker positioned as Europe’s answer to the American labs.
Inviting an American company onto European soil is a different theory of sovereignty entirely, one that prizes guaranteed access over domestic ownership, and the two ideas do not sit comfortably together.
Whether the Commission entertains the proposal is an open question. Virkkunen’s office had not publicly responded to the letter, and any move of this kind would involve legal, competition, and security questions that no single member state can settle. Austria, for its part, has put the option on the table and dared the rest of the bloc to say it is impossible.
The deeper point is the one Pröll left implicit. For all the talk of European AI independence, the continent’s most immediate problem this month was that a model it wanted to use stopped working because of a decision made in Washington. A letter cannot fix that, it can, at least, name it.
