The internet fractured one giant audience into thousands of tight-knit communities, and the brands paying attention are following the trust, not the follower count.
Having run performance-based influencer marketing campaigns across more than 2,000 brand partnerships, Tallinn-based Odience has started to notice some patterns. One of them, harder to ignore than the rest, is that creators driving the strongest results are rarely the biggest ones. What drives results doesn’t seem to be size, but trust.
Influencers have begun to build tight-knit communities obsessed by very specific things. And from a sales perspective, they’re more than exceeding expectations. It’s a shift that has been building for years.
For decades, marketing ran on one idea. Reach as many people as possible and some of them will buy. More eyes on the product meant more potential customers. Brands therefore chased scale like never before; through TV spots, billboards, and celebrity campaigns built to be seen by as many people as physically possible.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
That methodology is getting stale. Overexposure has left people feeling either numb or sceptical. Trust in big brands wore thin, because a product built for everyone ends up standing for no one.
The internet also played a part. It was supposed to hand marketers one enormous global audience, but it ended up doing the opposite. It fractured attention into thousands of smaller communities, and the algorithms that run our feeds have made those communities tighter than ever.
A Product for Everyone is a Product for No One
People gather online around shared obsessions. Marathon runners, mechanical keyboard enthusiasts, film buffs who have seen all the unreleased directors cuts. These groups can be small, but they are deeply engaged, and increasingly they outsell audiences many times their size. Scale stopped being the whole story. Closeness started mattering more.
Three things make a tight community sell. The first is identity. People do not just buy products, they buy signals about who they are. A niche community is built around exactly that kind of signal. The second is trust. A recommendation from someone inside your community carries weight that an ad never will. The third is relevance. Mass marketing talks to everyone, whereas if a campaign can speak to the hearts of a niche community, they’ll be opening their wallets fast.
These are not abstract forces. They show up in campaign data. The creators on Odience’s platform who consistently outperform expectations tend to have one thing in common: an audience that treats their recommendations as advice rather than advertising.
The Community Comes First
A lot of locked-in brands figured this out early, and started to grow out of communities rather than buying their way into them. Before Glossier was a company, its founder ran a beauty blog called Into the Gloss, where readers argued about routines, ingredients, and the products they loved and hated. By the time Glossier launched, it didn’t feel like a new brand was arriving. It felt like something the community had made for itself, and those early readers behaved less like customers and more like collaborators.
Notion followed a similar path. It did not take off because it advertised productivity. It took off because people obsessed with productivity systems started building elaborate dashboards and trackers inside it, then shared their templates and tutorials with everyone who would listen. Entire communities formed around the tool. Notion did not manufacture that. It handed people a canvas and got out of the way.
In both cases the community existed first and the product earned its place inside it. The dynamic Odience sees in its own data is an extension of the same principle: creators who have built that kind of community around a specific niche convert at rates that broader reach simply does not match.
What the Results Show
Following other tech success stories from Estonia, Odience is building a creator platform where payouts are tied to measurable campaign performance. A significant share of those payouts goes to nano and micro creators rather than only household names, showing that influence does not have to depend on celebrity status. Brands running campaigns through the platform pay for verified results, with clicks, leads, and sales tracked directly, meaning creator earnings reflect real performance rather than estimated reach.
The concentration of that value in smaller, niche creators is not incidental. It is consistent enough across verticals and geographies to point at something structural in how trust operates inside tight communities versus broad ones. One recent campaign in the gaming space, run through a single niche creator partnership, generated over 2,000 clicks and a conversion rate above 14%, several times what a comparable mass-reach placement would typically return.
Where the Money Goes Next
This doesn’t mean scale is at all dead. The smarter read is it being additive. Brands are not walking away from big campaigns. But they are layering something new on top of them. A set of smaller, higher-trust partnerships that track cleanly to results. A single mass push and a network of engaged micro communities are starting to work best together, each doing something the other cannot.
For creators, that shift represents a real change in how earning potential gets calculated. A large following is no longer a prerequisite for landing meaningful brand partnerships. Being essential to a specific audience, and having the data to demonstrate it, is starting to carry more weight with brands than raw reach ever did.
Odience is watching that new dynamic play out inside its own numbers, as more brands move budget toward the smaller, trust-driven partnerships the platform was built to track. The bigger campaigns aren’t going anywhere. The next round of spend is going to the creators who can prove a community actually listens to them.
