Camille Hanson woke one night in March to a notification: Meta had flagged her Facebook and Instagram accounts for deletion. She and her husband ran an English-teaching business there with nearly a million followers. Meta said she had breached its rules on fraud and deception, the New York Times reported.
She appealed. A week later Meta denied it. “All your information will be permanently deleted,” the reply read. “You cannot request another review of this decision.” The Hansons run the business from Portugal, so it was, as her husband put it, like someone shutting your storefront overnight.
Humans out of the loop
In March, Meta said it would hand more power to AI to judge which accounts break its rules and to handle the appeals. Months later, it laid off thousands of staff, including people who did exactly that work.
More than 60,000 users have since signed a petition asking Meta to explain its bans and to let a human review appeals. Reddit forums have filled with the same complaint: an automated system deletes an account, and no person answers.
Meta’s defence
Meta rejects the idea that AI is worse than people. Spokesman Daniel Roberts said its new moderation tools make 13% fewer mistakes than human staff and catch 10% more violations. The five accounts the Times flagged, he noted, were all banned by Meta’s older tools.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
“We’re committed to making fewer enforcement mistakes and helping individuals protect their accounts, and AI is delivering on both,” he said.
The company has had a rough run with automation, though. In May, hackers turned its AI customer-service chatbot against 34,000 Instagram accounts. Staff also revolted over a program that tracked their keystrokes to train AI. It has faced chaos on its AI ad tools too.
A Kafkaesque pattern
The wrongful bans often carry the worst possible label. Athenia Rodney, who has run the group JuneteenthNY for 17 years, had her accounts deleted over alleged child exploitation material. Her content, she said, is family friendly. Hackers had in fact seized her accounts.
To recover them she sent identity documents, complained to the FTC, and messaged Meta staff on LinkedIn. Nothing worked until the Times intervened. Meta restored one influencer, then banned him again days later for copyright, then reinstated him once more.
The European angle
The stakes are higher in Europe, where the same automated bans reach WhatsApp. The tech writer M.G. Siegler, banned three times, described his sudden WhatsApp lockout, with no warning or explanation. Much of the continent runs daily life through the app, from work to childcare.
Meta insists big decisions stay human. After 26 former staff sued, claiming an algorithm picked them for layoffs, Meta said such calls are “made by people, not AI.” Yet for millions of users, only a bot stands between them and deletion. The appeal is a bot too. The backlash is unlikely to fade while regulators sharpen their focus on platform accountability.
