Inverno6m ago
the score is incorrect, it was given a 6 not a 5. Either way I disagree with it. To whomever wrote this: if there’s demand for a sequel then clearly it did enough to deserve it.
I encourage you all to actually read the review, if only to keep in mind the reasons stated for the low scoring. Then think hard and without bias of how many games hold the same issues that still get praised by the media
