TL;DR
Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses have sold seven million pairs and command 82% of the market, yet a mounting privacy crisis surrounds the product. Women are being secretly filmed in public with little legal recourse, Kenyan data workers reported reviewing graphic footage captured by the glasses, and two US lawsuits allege Meta misled consumers about privacy. Apple, Google, and Snap are all preparing rival smart glasses for launch, each with cameras, ensuring the tension between wearable AI utility and bystander privacy will only intensify.
The woman was shopping in London when she noticed something odd about the man approaching her. He wore sunglasses indoors, asked her name, told her she was gorgeous. What she did not notice was the almost invisible camera embedded in the frames of his Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses, quietly recording every second of the encounter. She only discovered the footage later, after it had been uploaded online and accumulated tens of thousands of views. When she asked him to take it down, he told her that removal was “a paid service.”
She is far from alone. Across social media platforms, a pattern has emerged that is at once predictable and deeply unsettling: men wearing Meta’s AI-enabled glasses approach women on beaches, in shops, and on public streets, filming their reactions to casual questions or pick-up lines without consent. The women only learn of the recordings after the clips have already gained traction, and frequently abuse, online. Photography in public remains broadly legal in most jurisdictions, leaving those filmed with vanishingly little recourse.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
None of this has dented sales. Quite the opposite.
The numbers
Meta has now sold more than seven million pairs of its Ray-Ban smart glasses, according to figures shared by EssilorLuxottica, the eyewear giant that manufactures the devices in partnership with Meta. Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, boasted earlier this year that the glasses are “some of the fastest-growing consumer electronics in history.” Counterpoint Research estimates that Meta commands roughly 82% of the global smart glasses market as of the second half of 2025, a figure that has climbed steadily as the company expanded its product portfolio to include prescription lenses and new frame styles.
The glasses themselves are strikingly unremarkable to look at, which is precisely the point. Built on EssilorLuxottica’s classic Ray-Ban frames, they feature a near-invisible camera, small speakers tucked into the arms, and lenses capable of displaying limited information to the wearer. Recording a video or snapping a photo requires nothing more than a casual touch of the frame. A small indicator light is meant to signal when recording is active, but it appears dim in daylight and is easily overlooked. Most people encountering a wearer have no idea they are looking at anything other than an ordinary pair of sunglasses.
The footage pipeline
That inconspicuousness has produced consequences Meta likely did not anticipate, or at least did not foreground in its marketing. Earlier this year, workers at Sama, a Nairobi-based outsourcing firm contracted by Meta to produce AI training data, reported being required to review footage captured through the glasses that included people having sex, using the toilet, undressing, and handling sensitive financial documents. The revelations, first reported by Swedish journalists at Svenska Dagbladet and Goteborgs-Posten, prompted Meta to end its contract with Sama in April, with 1,108 workers receiving just six days’ notice. Meta said the firm did not meet its standards.
Two lawsuits followed in the United States. In one, filed by the Clarkson Law Firm in the Northern District of California on 4 March 2026, consumers allege that Meta marketed the glasses as “designed for privacy, controlled by you” while routing user footage through a human review pipeline in Kenya. A second suit was brought by individuals who say they had no idea their videos had been recorded through the device, let alone shared for review. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office and Kenya’s Office of the Data Protection Commissioner have both opened investigations. Meta has said that users were informed of the possibility of human review in some circumstances through its terms of service.
Tracy Clayton, a Meta spokesman, told the BBC that responsibility ultimately lies with the people wearing the glasses. “We have teams dedicated to limiting and combating misuse, but as with any technology, the onus is ultimately on individual people to not actively exploit it,” Clayton said.
Design as default
The framing is familiar, and it sidesteps a structural question: what happens when a device’s core design makes misuse not just possible but frictionless? The indicator light is too small to serve as meaningful notice. The camera is too discreet to prompt awareness. And the social norms that might have once governed the act of pointing a camera at a stranger dissolve entirely when the camera is embedded in something as banal as a pair of Ray-Bans. Privacy complaints against Meta for using personal data to train AI have been mounting across the European Union, but smart glasses add a physical dimension to what had been a largely digital dispute. It is one thing to train AI on posts users wrote on Facebook. It is another to train it on footage of strangers in their homes, captured by a wearable and reviewed by a contractor in a different country.
The queue forms
For the technology industry, these concerns appear to represent an acceptable cost of entry into what many now believe will be the next major consumer electronics category. Apple is reportedly testing at least four frame designs for its own smart glasses, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, with a possible unveiling late this year and a public release in early 2027. The devices are expected to connect to the iPhone for hands-free Siri access, calls, and photos, powered by a custom processor based on Apple Watch architecture.
Snap, meanwhile, has spun its augmented reality glasses effort into a standalone subsidiary called Specs Inc. and plans to launch a consumer version of its Specs later this year. The new device will run on Snap OS 2.0 and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR platform, offering AR experiences, a native browser, and AI assistance layered over the physical world.
Then there is Google, returning to territory it once fled. The company’s original Google Glass, launched with considerable fanfare in 2013, was pulled from the consumer market within two years after the pricey gadget became a lightning rod for privacy objections. More than a decade later, Google is preparing to launch Android XR smart glasses in 2026, initially without a display but with cameras, microphones, and Gemini AI integration. Hardware partners include Samsung, Warby Parker, and Gentle Monster.
All of these devices will, in some form, feature a camera. All of them will need to reckon with the same tension Meta has so far failed to resolve: how to build a product whose value depends on capturing the world around the wearer, while respecting the autonomy of every person that world contains.
The other side of the lens
Not everyone wearing the current generation of smart glasses is using them to film strangers, of course. Mark Smith, a partner at advisory firm ISG who focuses on enterprise software, wears his Meta Ray-Bans daily and describes their appeal in terms that have nothing to do with surveillance. He listens to music while washing up, takes hands-free phone calls, and snaps quick photos while travelling without reaching for his phone. “The basic features are great,” Smith told the BBC. But even he acknowledged that the privacy dynamics are conspicuous. The recording light is hard to spot in daylight. Most people he encounters have no idea they are near a camera.
This is the paradox the industry has chosen to barrel through rather than resolve. Seven million pairs of Meta’s glasses are already on faces around the world. Apple, Google, and Snap are each preparing to add millions more. The technology works. The market is growing. And the woman in London who found herself secretly recorded and then charged for the privilege of disappearing from the internet has no more power over the situation today than she did the moment a stranger in sunglasses walked up and pressed record.
