TL;DR
Victoria proposes “demasking” powers to force platforms to identify anonymous accounts in vilification cases. It would also make it easier for families to sue platforms for harm to children.
Victoria’s premier Jacinta Allan announced on Sunday that the state would propose laws granting the Victorian civil and administrative tribunal power to order social media and AI platforms to reveal the identities of anonymous account holders accused of online vilification. The “demasking” powers would be the first of their kind for an Australian state. Allan said families needed new ways to protect their children online.
The proposed reforms go beyond identity disclosure. Victoria would also scrap the legal threshold that currently requires families to prove a child has suffered a permanent impairment of at least 10% before suing platforms for negligence causing psychiatric harm. That threshold, assessed by medical practitioners using standardised calculations, has made it effectively impossible for most families to pursue damages. Removing it for suits brought on behalf of minors would open a new litigation channel against platforms in Australian courts.
The timing is tight. Victoria has four sitting weeks before a November state election, and the opposition said the laws were unlikely to pass in time. Shadow attorney general James Newbury said the Coalition supported the effort in principle but that “I don’t think Elon Musk is looking at Jacinta Allan’s announcement today and quaking in his boots.” Australia’s world-leading under-16 social media ban is already struggling with enforcement, with testers finding that age verification systems are easy to bypass. Adding demasking powers to a regime that cannot yet verify who is under 16 raises questions about whether the infrastructure exists to enforce them.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Marilyn Bromberg, a social media regulation specialist at the University of Western Australia, called the reforms “a brave start” but said they should extend beyond vilification to cover defamation and cyberbullying. The Australian Senate delayed fixes to the social media ban earlier this year, and the federal government is still working on an enforcement framework that would compel platforms to comply. Victoria’s move adds a state-level litigation tool to a federal regulatory structure that remains incomplete. Whether platforms respond to the threat of tribunal orders in a single Australian state depends on whether the political signal outlasts the election cycle.
