Citing privacy and accuracy concerns, cities like Lynchburg, Virginia, and states like Florida have turned against Flock, the nation’s main purveyor of automated license plate readers (ALPRs); conservative GOP politicians like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri have too.
Meanwhile, San Francisco — which has one of the most liberal voting records in the U.S. — is sticking with its more than 400 Flock cameras.
The city just adopted a new policy late last month that keeps the cameras rolling, but places new limits on them, including requiring police officers to obtain approval from their bosses, and a connection to an active criminal investigation, to search camera data more than 30 days old and demonstrate a connection to an active criminal investigation, San Francisco’s NBC news affiliate reported.
Crime is dropping, but why?
San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins recently defended the AI-powered cameras to NPR.
“What the license plate reader cameras have absolutely done — and we do have proof of this — is give the police the ability to catch people who have engaged in crime,” she said.
There is no question that crime is down in San Francisco, which dropped almost 59 percent and more than 82 percent, respectively, in January through August 2026 compared with the same period in 2022, according to NPR’s analysis of SFPD data. Whether that has anything to do with Flock is less clear, especially because other factors, like the AI boom gentrification wave and the dramatic nationwide post-COVID crime drop, could also be at play.
Then-Mayor London Breed threw a press conference in 2024 to proudly tout the deployment of Flock cameras in the city. “These license plate readers can play a critical role in disrupting retail theft, car break-ins, sideshows, and other criminal activity,” Breed said at the time.
That press conference came shortly after San Francisco voters approved Proposition E, a police-related initiative that granted the SFPD authority for the “use of drones along with or instead of vehicular pursuits” and “installation of surveillance and facial recognition cameras without approval from the police commission or board of supervisors.”
Mashable Light Speed
A poll from July showed that San Franciscans remained supportive of surveillance as a tool against crime.
“The San Francisco Police Department sometimes uses drones and cameras after a 911 call to assist in an active investigation,” read one question from the GrowSF poll. “Do you support or oppose allowing the use of drones and cameras after a 911 call to assist in an active investigation?”
A majority of respondents, 72 percent, strongly supported or somewhat supported that use of drones and cameras, while only 12 percent strongly opposed it. (The question did not ask specifically about Flock.)
City by the Bay Server
The poll of 662 voters was commissioned by GrowSF, a group founded in 2020 by tech workers that’s “focused on winning local elections, holding leaders accountable, and giving voters clear, honest information.” Many of GrowSF’s board members work or have worked in the tech industry, and one of its billionaire funders, Chris Larsen, assisted the SFPD in the Flock purchase, according to SFGate.
And when she announced the Flock deal, Breed emphasized the use of technology to catch crooks.
“While we are relentless in staffing up our police force, we are also incorporating technology that supports the hard work our officers do every day to take care of our City and arrest those who think they can break the law in San Francisco,” she said.
Maybe it’s not a surprise that a city so connected to Silicon Valley (and employed by it) has a soft spot for AI-powered technology.
The collective shrug about Flock and its privacy concerns extends beyond San Francisco to California’s state government, which has a Democratic governor and a Democratic supermajority in the legislature. Last month, state lawmakers rejected regulations on Flock for the fifth time.
And even as Flock has become a major midterm issue throughout the country, the issue of ALPRs were not raised at the recent California gubernatorial debate between Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton. Flock also hasn’t emerged as a major issue between Scott Wiener and Connie Chan in their effort to replace Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi as San Francisco’s representative in the U.S. House.
“The SF that would reject surveillance is gone and dead,” James Lance Taylor, chair of the politics department at the University of San Francisco, told the San Francisco Standard.
